Latest buzz on twitter

Song Writing - Substance and Simplicity
20 replies

Substance We serve a God beyond all understanding. We worship an indescribable God. Yet we sing so many songs that lyrically say very little. Christopher Idle says, “When the mood leads to a suspension of critical faculties helped by an exciting or seductive tune, it is sadly easy to get people to sing nonsense.” As songwriters there is a responsibility to write songs of substance. A key question when evaluating a song has to be; does it say anything of worth? Is there content to the song? Do the lyrics provoke thought? To the Church in Colosse, Paul writes, “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly as you teach and admonish one another with all wisdom, and as you sing psalms, hymns and spiritual songs with gratitude in your hearts to God.” (Colossians 3:16) The Church was in danger of focusing too much on emotions and feelings. They needed to be reminded to allow the truth and word of Christ to dwell in them richly. Some of us need to receive the same challenge. Are we writing songs of substance? Are we singing eternal truths? If you want to write songs that will glorify God and edify the Church, maybe first you need to get stuck into God’s word. Study it, ponder upon it and chew it over. When your heart is bursting with a deeper understanding of all that God is, then start to sing it out. I love the story of the American communicator, James Ryle. He became a Christian shortly after being sentenced to prison. After his amazing conversion, he felt that God was calling him to preach the word. Rather than waste all the years he had ahead of him in prison doing nothing, James decided to study and prepare to be the best communicator he could be. He devoured and studied God’s word. He even read through the entire dictionary so as to improve his word power. How willing are we to be the best songwriters we can be? To be the best involves hard work. Some fantastic song writing aids to enable this include: · A thesaurus - this will give you new words and an increased vocabulary for greater description. · A concordance - this will enable you to see all that the bible might say on a particular theme. · Varied translations of the bible (i.e. The NIV, The Message, The RSV, The King James version) - This will give you a fuller understanding of a verse, as well as different lyrical possibilities. · Hymnbooks - The old hymns are packed full of poetry, imagery and language that can’t help but inspire. It’s also always great to learn from other skilled songwriters. How do they put a phrase together? How do they use imagery? How do they unpack a message? I’m often moved and challenged by the lyrics of other bands. The way Mike Skinner of ‘The Streets,’ communicates a story and an insight into normal life is amazing. An honesty and vulnerability is expressed that we in the Church could learn from. Or the beauty of life and love captured in U2’s lyrics inspires me to convey something of the beauty of God. Simplicity Whilst writing songs with substance, there must be a place for simplicity. Brian Doerkson says, “The most enduring songs are virtually without exception the simple ones.” I agree with him. There has been a recent drive to encourage writers to fill their songs with content and doctrine. I think this has been a wonderful challenge. However my fear is that we go too far. That we end up with songs packed so densely with content, that they are impossible to sing and remember. The aim has to be both substance and simplicity. To convey a profound mystery in a simple lyric takes great skill and thought. A message can be easily lost and blurred by a barrage of words. It’s also with some of the simple love songs, that our hearts can most engage. I love songs like, “I love you Lord,” “Jesus Your love has melted my heart,” and “Isn’t He beautiful.” We need more of these songs. In a letter to songwriters, Sandy Millar, vicar of HTB London, writes, “I would love to see a renewed energy going into writing simple, heartfelt intimate expressions of love…We need songs that are simpler songs that can be learned very easily, and sung from the heart.” In my experience these songs are actually the hardest to write. In writing these songs a couple of questions to ponder over are: · Clarity - Does the song have a focus? Is there a clear theme running through the song? A good test is whether you could summarise the theme of the song is a short sentence. If not maybe you need some editing. · Singability - Does the song have a simple and memorable melody or hook? If it’s hard to remember and pick up the tune, then it kills the whole point of it being a simple song. I love what Paul says in 1 Corinthians 14:15 - “I will sing with my spirit, but I will also sing with my mind.” We need to write songs that enable people to sing with their minds, but also sing with their spirits. The great songs will inspire our intellects and allow our spirits to soar. Tim Hughes

Tim
Brilliant points Tim, really helpful. Thanks :-)
Thanks for posting this!! It's really bought a new light onto songwriting :) x
It's a difficult balance to find isn't it? On one hand you could end up with the biggest heap of cliched mush that promises everything but says nothing and on the other extreme you could have an excellent theological statement that you can't get your tongue or head around. On reflection, I think this is where having a second input during your songwriting can help (especially from a theologian or scholar who is less fussy about the musicality and more concerned about the "what" of the song rather than the "how"). That's why places like WorshipCentral are helpful in feeding back during the creative process. And it's during the process where we should receive and accept guidance - not afterwards once the MP3 has been mastered and put up for sale on iTunes. That's the other pitfall - with today's technology it's all too easy to "finish" a song within minutes, with the recording and mixing taking 95% of the time and the chords/words/melody being dashed off in a quick creative 5% of the time. I recently tried writing the words properly first and leaving the final tune or any demoing until I was sure about how the message was worded. It was actually a lot harder to stop yourself from jotting down the ideas and letting the first thought be the final say. Harder, but more worthwhile....so I'd encourage others to try that if they haven't before :) http://www.facebook.com/laurencemurray
I find the majority of worship songs to be awful. People seem to think they can just string together some Bible verses and that's a song. They have no real concept of art - it's all propaganda. And as long as it contains the right key words, the congregations will mindlessly lap it up. Some of the songs we sing in church are so bad that I can't believe that I'm the only one who cringes at them, but everyone else seems to be happily joining in - well they're supposed to, aren't they? God forbid that anyone should cease to conform! This is not only in the evangelical charismatic type church I go to, but also at the more liberal MCC church, where the lyrics of well known hymns are unsubtly altered to express more politically correct views and inclusive language. I don't mind that, but some of the contortions the rewriters get into are quite painful - another form of overly didactic lyrics and this time they don't scan. I write songs, but I don't write worship songs. The reason being that I wouldn't find it a sufficient challenge. It seems that any old crap will do. The approach to art of most people in churches is typified by the response I got from one of my church leaders when I told her I wrote songs, 'Worship songs?' No, love songs actually and songs about life. Why did she automatically assume that as a Christian I would be writing worship songs? I'm not involved in worship except as an ordinary punter and much of it for me takes place on my balcony perched mid-way between the green trees and the immense sky.
'Each and everybody is hiding, each is concealing the place where his heart beats.' Daniel Barenboim (conductor, pianist, peacemaker)
Hey Tiggy Sorry to be pedantic, but just tagging you on something you said in another thread about words you can't take seriously anymore because of the way they've been used. "Awful" is one of those words. So in your first line of the post above did you mean 'I find the majority of worship songs to be terrble/really bad/atrocious'? Or did you mean 'I find the majority of worship songs to be awe inspiring, amazing, awesome, filling me with fearful wonderment and reverance'? You see, that word has also lost it's meaning... *Edit* Then: If you see the so-called 'worship' songs as complete rubbish and inefficient, why not take up the 'challenge' of changing that, of writing songs that are 'good enough', instead of standing by and slamming those that have attempted it. Perhaps you have tried and found it difficult yourself to not 'conform' or to come up with 'any old ....'. You see, it IS a more than sufficient challenge... To try and capture even just a glimpse of God in a song... I'd say that's quite a challenge. As for the reaction from your church leader... actually first let me address 'worship'. You say you're 'not involved in worship except as an ordinary punter.' (polemic remarks trimmed). You see, worship is more than music, more than a song. Way more. Worship is what we were created for, it is our primary purpose on this earth. To bring pleasure to God through our lives - that is worship. It is a whole-life thing, a lifestyle. It's not what we do on a sunday at church, or on your balcony at home. It is offering up our lives as a living sacrifice (check out Romans 12:1-2), offering all that we are, all that we do. EVERYTHING. So, if I met someone who lived in this way - a life of worship - and they told me they wrote songs I would assume the majority of those songs would be God-centered/focused songs (the ones you call worship songs), why - because that's what matters, that's what's important, that's the reason they sing, that's the reason they live. Sure they'll write a song about a girl or about how they feel, but the majority would be focused on God, exploring his character, singing praises to him etc. (a small part of this thing called worship) So back to your church leader's assumption, perhaps you're right, perhaps one shouldn't assume a 'christian' is going to write only 'worship' songs... Because there are so many so-called 'christians' who don't have a clue what worship really is. But a 'man after God's own heart', now him I would expect to write 'worship' songs. (polemic remarks trimmed) So here's a challenge. Forget music for while. Get involved in worship - true, whole-life worship. Then, take up the challenge of writing some decent/acceptable/'real art' songs about God and to God (the so-called 'worship' songs) (without all those words you can't take seriously) And hopefully then we can stop singing 'any old ....' in church because someone finally wrote something that's 'real art'.
Well, I don't think awful ever really meant anything good...? Who knows. I think the difficulty comes in remembering the difference between SIMPLICITY and SIMPLISTIC. Simple songs don't have to be basic songs. I think the difference is important; much in the same way the God wants us to have child-like faith, not for us to be childish. Big difference.
http://www.yorkelim.com
Hey Neil (edited my previous post) a quick google search provides the following: "awed: inspired by a feeling of fearful wonderment or reverence; "awed by the silence"; "awful worshippers with bowed heads" " awe + full = awful i.e. filled with awe. But yes, over time it has come to mean things like: atrocious, displeasing, bad, terror, frightful, nasty... etc etc... Agree with your simplicity vs simplistic comment.
Wow, I had no idea that 'awful' once had positive connotations!! Do you think 'terrific' once meant something similar to 'terrifying'? Getting nicely off topic here... Ha!
http://www.yorkelim.com
Another quick google search yields the following results (amongst others) "causing extreme terror; "a terrifying wail" " "Frighteningly good; Astounding or awesome; Terrifying; causing terror; Frightful or very unpleasant"
How interesting!! I wonder at what point we started swapping the definition of our words... I suppose it's similar to how words like 'cool' and 'wicked' are used in slang now. The most intriguing one for me is how 'gay' originally meant something very nice/jolly/happy, and now it means homosexual. That's quite a switch!
http://www.yorkelim.com