Latest buzz on twitter

Changing Song Words?

Changing Song Words?

1 Oct 2008

I was having an interesting chat yesterday with a friend about whether it's OK to change words of a worship song that's not yours. 

I remember a many years ago our church had introduced a song by a well known worship leader, but had made a slightly cheeky tweak to one of the lyrics in the version we used, just changing one word on the overhead projector. Our version had become a standard for our church, and we'd always sung it that way. I had just joined the team at HTB as a worship leader and on one of my first Sundays leading, I was using this particular song, and to my horror I spotted the author sitting at the back of the congregation, just as we got to the tweaked lyric. I quickly began to sing the right word, but the game was given away by the fact that the whole congregation sang something else! Since then I've learned my lesson! Anyway, my friend is a theologian and was raising a question he had about one lyric in a song we're currently using. His point was, could we not just change that one tiny lyric to make the song work. One example would be the famous hymn O Lord My God. I have heard that some theologians feel that the lyric 'When Christ shall come with shouts of acclamation, and take me home, what joy shall fill my heart' is weak because we really believe that Jesus is coming back here to this earth, not taking us away somewhere else. The trouble is it's actually very hard to change lyrics once a song is out there. There are a number of problems: firstly, it would be terribly confusing if every church sang slightly different versions of songs, and secondly if the song has been published, it actually becomes illegal to alter the lyrics, as they have been protected by copyright. We concluded that, tempting as it is, it is much better to (a) make sure the songs we write get proper vetting from people with a good training in theology before we launch them on the congregation, and (b) if in doubt about a song, either don't do it, or simply 'bend in love' and chose to use it, even though it's probably slightly less than perfect. We try and run all the new songs we've written past our theologian friend, but I wonder if we should be doing the same thing with new songs that we're introducing from other places too?


First of all, the lyric cited above in "O Lord My God" is consistent with much theology. It depends on which brand of eschatology to which one subscribes. Secondly, are you sure it's against copyright legislation? I am not a lawyer, but I do believe that this sort of modification is protected under fair use. But I have been known to be wrong before.
The main comment I would like to make is that I agree that we need to make sure that we sing songs that have good rounded theology and thinking through the next set of songs that we plan to introduce and running it past leadership is key. But, I don't believe that we should have a problem tweaking odd lines now and again. Changing some of the 'I' songs to 'We' songs can help us as congregations to make statements of faith as a body of believers. We often change the famous 'I believe in Jesus' (Marc Nelson) to 'We believe in Jesus'. This is an easy melody to sing and helps children make the statement as part of the church. Changing some of the 'be' songs to 'you're' can bring fresh meaning and revelation to songs. Singing 'Jesus be the centre' can lead us to a passive mindset, whereas making the statement Jesus you're the centre can push people into thinking a little more about what they are singing! Am I living my life based on this truth - that Jesus IS the centre of my life? etc. So we'll often do once as 'be' and the second time as 'you're'. I think it is an interesting topic and I'm not sure about the whole copyright issues, but as we continue to write songs and as some of them reach wider audiences - I pray that we would all be in a place to let others tweak them now and again to aid thoughtful worship in their congregations.
This is a great topic and one which often is not clear as to what is allowed. We had a similar, intriguing debate about this on He Must Increase - see: http://www.hemustincrease.com/forum/topic/show?id=988607%3ATopic%3A22661 Keeps our minds ticking! Phil http://www.worshiptherock.com - Worldwide Worship http://www.hemustincrease.com - UK Worship
Phil http://www.worshiptherock.com - Worldwide Worship Leaders & Musicians http://www.hemustincrease.com - UK Worship Leaders & Musicians
Interesting topic for sure. I guess I would land on the side of not changing lyrics for the sake of the kingdom. It does seem that it could be divisive to encourage the minor tweaking of lyrics, although well intended, it could really cause a lot of confusion, especially considering how fast songs travel these days. I suppose it's also a good wake up call to pass your songs through a theologian before you call it finished. I suppose I'm guilty since I just minced my words the other day and sang "all of me is more than enough than all of You".
I would love to find out whether it is against the copyright law? I love the song 'God of this City' the only trouble is I live in a town?!?! I wanted to change the chorus to 'And greater things are still to be done in His NNNAAAAMMEEEE!(Name)' What do you think? Very biblical and in keeping with Jesus' words about doing greater things. Do you think Bluetree would mind? God Bless mark c
completely agree with you al, ive had this debate with people for yrs. this sort of thing happens all over the world sadly, and although i doubt any one will ever sue anyone for changing their lyrics and breaching copyright, it doesnt really honour the writer if you dont get their permission. my thoughts are: if youre thinking about changing a lyric especially on theological grounds dont! either dont use the song or write a better one that fits your churches theology. gav.
Unless it is illegal, i'm on the side of small changes are OK. Assuming you're not recording songs and selling for cash with the changes. We often find small issues with good songs for example: Majesty - 'here I am knowing I AM sinful man' - not any longer, so we sing 'knowing i WAS sinful man...now covered by the blood of the lamb' Indescribable - 'you've seen the depths of my heart but you love me the same' - the depths of my heart are no longer sinful so we sing 'you saw the depths of my heart and loved me the same' Surely it's better to make slight alterations that not use the otherwise excellent songs? Sam
Sam
yes i think its illegal sam, if you read the link phil posted above there are a lot of thoughts on the legal side. here it is again: http://www.hemustincrease.com/forum/topic/sho... how would you feel if someone changed the words to a song you had written esp on theological grounds? also we are sinners and do sin are you saying you dont sin anymore? jesus death on the cross doesnt stop us from having sin in our lives but it forgives us of the sin. i sin both the songs you mention with the original words knowing that althought im striving not to sin i havent got there yet. just some thoughts, feel free to disagree.
I remember in my church growing up we had to change the Lyric in What a friend I've found from Lovers to Brothers. Something about singing about intimate lovers that was not to be had in my church! I always thought it was lame - but at the same time I'm sure we didn't even come close with the right chords either.
Interesting topic. I have seen several churches do this. Unfortunately, sometimes it can be taken to extremes to the point that a poetic song becomes a cheesy string of words. As far as the legality goes, you have to get the permission of whoever owns the rights to the song. I know someone who contacted Tomlin's publisher in an attempt to change a word and they said no so he just didn't do the song. Thanks for the thoughts Al Peace